On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:54:24AM +0200, Berke Durak wrote:
> I know, that's the one whose UTF8 module is in ExtLib.  For manipulating
> Unicode
> chars it is very complete and nice, but for UTF8 it lacks a few basic
> functions.
> I contributed two, substring extraction and appending a uChar as UTF8 to an
> output_channel without creating a buffer, which should come out with the
> next ExtLib,
> but there are still missing basic functions (such as conversion functions
> from buffer to uchar
> array, etc.).

Adding stuff to the extlib UTF8 module without having the
corresponding changes in Camomile is dangerous - the two cannot then
be used at the same time.  This is really a problem with extlib, it
just shouldn't be distributing this module.

In any case, why don't you just use Camomile?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat