Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
-
Jon Harrop
- Matthew William Cox
- Arthur Chan
- Tom_PrimožiÄ
- Elliott Oti
- Richard Jones
- David Teller
- Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
-
Vincent Hanquez
-
Jon Harrop
- Vincent Hanquez
- Ralph Douglass
-
Jon Harrop
- Ulf Wiger (TN/EAB)
- Kuba Ober
- Kuba Ober
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-05-09 (22:08) |
From: | Vincent Hanquez <tab@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml **cks |
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:23:50AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > That's just crazy talk. Nobody can afford to ignore the multicore era that we > have been in for some time now. I can find lots of interesting use of all my cores without having all my programs be _automaticly_ multi threaded. > > exception traces are *not* available in long running program (daemon). > > Because you compiled it wrongly or because you lost the output? i see you have no idea what a daemon is, and how ocaml can print its stack trace only on stderr when reaching toplevel (i.e. quitting). (on a non-modified version of ocaml) > > have you been hiding in a cave lately? > > With yo mamma. this actually sum up your posts and the idea contains in them pretty well. > You aren't customer facing are you? funny enough that you say that. we both know, which one of us is actually producing some ocaml software that is really selling. -- Vincent