Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml sucks |
On Friday 09 May 2008 08:45:09 Richard Jones wrote: > > 1. Lack of Parallelism: Yes, this is already a complete show stopper. > > Why can't you just fork off enough processes to cover each core? They need to share data, e.g. write results into the same matrix or mutate the same array. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e