Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Arthur Chan <baguasquirrel@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml rocks |
> > > The fact is, this is hugely important to the vast majority of the software > industry and companies are investing massive amounts of time and effort > into > parallelizing their software. Developers are flocking to .NET because it > makes parallelism easy and OCaml has the potential to provide these > benefits > if the parallel GC project flies. > > Maybe... while I agree with your earlier points, I have not seen *any* .NET uptake in the bay area, particularly with startups. People are using Hadoop, or some in-house version of it, or toying with Erlang, to get parallel efficiency.