[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jeremy Yallop <jeremy.yallop@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] surprising type error with labels |
Jake Donham wrote:
> Why does
>
> ListLabels.find (fun _ -> true) [];;
>
> produce
>
> Characters 16-31:
> ListLabels.find (fun _ -> true) [];;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This expression should not be a function, the expected type is
> ('a -> 'b) list
>
> I thought the rule was that "if an application is total, labels may be
> omitted." (4.1 in the manual). (I was trying to do module List =
> ListLabels at the top of a file.) Thanks,
Applications of functions whose return types are type variables are
never considered total, since it's possible to pass extra arguments if
the type variable is instantiated to a function type. For example,
ListLabels.find has type
f:('a -> bool) -> 'a list -> 'a
If the type variable is instantiated to `bool -> bool', say, then you
can pass more than two arguments:
ListLabels.find ~f:(fun f -> f false) [not] false
You can use the function without labels if you fix its return type:
(ListLabels.find : f:_ -> _ -> int) (fun _ -> true) []
Jeremy.