[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-06-19 (21:59) |
From: | Jeremy Yallop <jeremy.yallop@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] surprising type error with labels |
Jake Donham wrote: > Why does > > ListLabels.find (fun _ -> true) [];; > > produce > > Characters 16-31: > ListLabels.find (fun _ -> true) [];; > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This expression should not be a function, the expected type is > ('a -> 'b) list > > I thought the rule was that "if an application is total, labels may be > omitted." (4.1 in the manual). (I was trying to do module List = > ListLabels at the top of a file.) Thanks, Applications of functions whose return types are type variables are never considered total, since it's possible to pass extra arguments if the type variable is instantiated to a function type. For example, ListLabels.find has type f:('a -> bool) -> 'a list -> 'a If the type variable is instantiated to `bool -> bool', say, then you can pass more than two arguments: ListLabels.find ~f:(fun f -> f false) [not] false You can use the function without labels if you fix its return type: (ListLabels.find : f:_ -> _ -> int) (fun _ -> true) [] Jeremy.