Browse thread
thousands of CPU cores
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores |
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 02:43:53PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 11 July 2008 14:01:45 Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > > In the past, it was very important for hardware vendors that existing > > software runs quicker on new CPU generations. This is no longer true for > > multicore. So unless there is a software revolution that makes it simple > > to exploit multicore, we won't see 1024-cores for the masses. > > That revolution happened several years ago when everyone migrated to the JVM > and CLR and their concurrent GCs made it easy to exploit multicores. CLR & JVM running easily on 1024 cores, this I gotta see! Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat