Browse thread
thousands of CPU cores
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores |
Zitat von Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>: [...] > The interesting question that this community should focus on > (rather than throwing fits about concurrent GC and the like) is > coming > up with good programming models for parallelism. OK, I agree, but parallel programming is not really new. It's just new on or small PCs we ahve at home It's used since 20 years on high-performance/high-end computers. I'm not sure there were functional programming models used, I rather doubt this, but I'm not very familiar with that area. If there already would be some kind of know-how in parallel functional programming, this might be adapted to the PCs. [...] > I'm quite fond of > message passing myself, but agree that more constrained data-parallel > models have value as well. As Gerd Stolpmann mentioned, various > forms > of message passing can be exploited from OCaml today, but there is > certainly room for improvement there. [...] Can you name it? I mean... the room for improvement. Ciao, Oliver