Browse thread
native vs bytecode
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kuba Ober <ober.14@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] native vs bytecode |
> With this strategy, OCaml programs at Red Hat are performing as well > as C code, and about an order of magnitude faster & an order of > magnitude lower memory usage than programs written in Python, which is > the main language used around here. What does RedHat use OCaml for? That's just to satisfy my curiosity. A quick google for ocaml at redhat did not yield much. Cheers, Kuba