Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Haskell vs OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Paul Snively <psnively@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

FWIW, I still use darcs (darcs 2) exclusively. So far, no other  
version control system has gotten the relationships among  
repositories, branching, and merging quite right, although I'm keeping  
a keen eye on Mercurial's forthcoming "rebase" extension.

On Aug 14, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:

> On Thursday 14 August 2008 22:50:19 you wrote:
>> I'm talking about the informal algorithms, their independent of  
>> that kind
>> of things...
>
> Yes, that may well be true. I think we would need in-depth knowledge  
> of Darcs
> to be able to distinguish between the two.
>
> Do any OCaml projects use Darcs, BTW?
>
> -- 
> Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
> http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiqMqsACgkQIVlHUIJ6Q02suQCgim9bDlna3r0WYl8Qb2DHQDuy
zgEAn1VRvTKhaKIphvp++BJJb3cyASph
=Mq8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----