On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:32:07 +0100
Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 August 2008 07:29:21 you wrote:
> > So I already use Chamo for my daily work (development, edition of text
> > files). What's missing now is access to more information like location of
> > definitions, completion and so on. I'm waiting for the result of
> > ocamlwizard[3] to see how to use these tools in Chamo to provide these
> > missing features.
> 
> Intellisense-style completion would be incredibly productive, particularly in 
> the context of GUI programming but note that doing this for LablGTK2 would 
> require the system to have used type inference and type annotations on the 
> structurally-typed objects in the source code to determine the type of the 
> start of an expression in order to propose completions for it.

Indeed. By the way, I'm not a big fan of completion, I prefer to use/train
my memory :-)

Maxence


-- 
Maxence Guesdon                           http://yquem.inria.fr/~guesdon/
Service Expérimentation et Développements https://devel.inria.fr/rocq/
INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt                  http://www.inria.fr/rocquencourt/