-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2008 22:50:19 you wrote:
>> I'm talking about the informal algorithms, their independent of that kind
>> of things...
> 
> Yes, that may well be true. I think we would need in-depth knowledge of Darcs 
> to be able to distinguish between the two.
> 
> Do any OCaml projects use Darcs, BTW?

We use Darcs as the VCS for Marionnet. See http://darcs.marionnet.org .

Darcs 2 has yet to give us any headache; the "exponential merge" corner
cases of version 1 are apparently gone, and now it's quite a pleasure to
use.

- --
Luca Saiu
http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu
GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon
Marionnet:   http://www.marionnet.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkineB4ACgkQvzOavibF0oYvqQCeMXMygLIy46MFhFJqmOU8n6qJ
kDwAn3xb+Ezu6Ky/cdZPgKFLNM/0bVBN
=rOZh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----