Browse thread
native vs bytecode
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kuba Ober <ober.14@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] native vs bytecode |
On Thursday 07 August 2008, Kuba Ober wrote: > > With this strategy, OCaml programs at Red Hat are performing as well > > as C code, and about an order of magnitude faster & an order of > > magnitude lower memory usage than programs written in Python, which is > > the main language used around here. > > What does RedHat use OCaml for? That's just to satisfy my curiosity. A > quick google for ocaml at redhat did not yield much. I should say that I did look at your page, so the question should rather be: what does RedHat use Ocaml for, other than what RJ is using it for? :) Cheers, Kuba