English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
native vs bytecode
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2008-08-07 (13:13)
From: Kuba Ober <ober.14@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] native vs bytecode
On Thursday 07 August 2008, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > With this strategy, OCaml programs at Red Hat are performing as well
> > as C code, and about an order of magnitude faster & an order of
> > magnitude lower memory usage than programs written in Python, which is
> > the main language used around here.
> What does RedHat use OCaml for? That's just to satisfy my curiosity. A
> quick google for ocaml at redhat did not yield much.

I should say that I did look at your page, so the question should rather be:
what does RedHat use Ocaml for, other than what RJ is using it for? :)

Cheers, Kuba