Browse thread
Native code compile time question
-
Raj Bandyopadhyay
- Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Jon Harrop
- Richard Jones
- Christophe TROESTLER
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Native code compile time question |
Raj Bandyopadhyay wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am implementing a language by generating OCaml code for input source
> and using the OCaml native code compiler. However, I've run into a
> strange problem.
>
> On using my code generator on a large program, I generate a file containing about 75K lines of OCaml.
> The native code compiler takes more than 30 *minutes* to compile this file! The bytecode compiler takes about 5 secs.
It depends of your langage and of the code you are generating, but maybe
Ocaml is not the right tool for that. Did you consider stuff like LLVM
http://llvm.org/ or C-- http://cminusminus.org/ both designed to be
languages to be generated by a program (not to be coded in by a human)?
It could also be that you are generating huge functions. Avoid
generating huge functions (and you'll get the same kind of troubles if
you generate huge C functions).
All the low level code generation issues and algorithms (e.g.
instruction scheduling, register allocation) are violently non linear.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***