[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <alain@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] on polymorphic compare and objects |
Peng Zang wrote: > For objects, we require that all objects > implement an equal method that satisfies the semantic contract. How do you ensure that the method is indeed implemented and has the correct type? A more robust approach to attaching custom generic operations to arbitrary data would be to introduce the equivalent of custom blocks, but for OCaml data. This probably amounts to reserving a new GC tag and deciding on a memory layout (e.g. a block with this tag has two fields: the underlying value and a dictionary of generic functions). Then simple modules in stdlib could expose a well-typed interface (ensuring that the type of the dictionary's functions is compatible with the type of the underlying values). It would even be possible to expose the resulting blocks as values of a private record type with two fields, so as to preserve pattern matching on the underlying value. Alain