Browse thread
Metaprogramming features
-
Jacques Carette
- Dario Teixeira
- David Teller
- Stefano Zacchiroli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-10-03 (16:01) |
From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Metaprogramming features |
Gasp, lobbying on this list ? :) I strongly agree with that feature request. One reason is all the code which is currently in Camlp4 but actually deserves the MetaOCaml treatment. The other reason is that I believe that the Haskell vs. OCaml race matters. Cheers, David On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 10:34 -0400, Jacques Carette wrote: > Note that OCaml could be really ahead of Haskell here (with its untyped > Template Haskell, which is closer to camlp4 than to metaocaml) by being > the first production language to have _typed_ metaprogramming facilities. > =================== > > This feature request is currently the entry in Mantis which has (by far!) the largest number of comments from separate people, as well as now being the entry with the most comments overall. > > Please add your voice to the chorus! > > Jacques -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.