Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Re: Serialisation of PXP DTDs
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Serialisation of PXP DTDs
Hi,

> Bin-prot is settled in its design.  We heavily rely on it here
> at Jane Street and store TBs of data in it so there is no way
> it's going to change.  I would say it is future-proof.

Thanks for the clarification, Markus, and I will take a closer
look at bin-prot.  One question, however: is it possible to use
*both* the sexplib and bin-prot syntax extensions on the same
structure?  That way convenience for the developer is preserved,
and users can choose which side of the performance vs readability
trade-off they prefer.

Cheers,
Dario