Browse thread
Road to native windows OCaml...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Allsopp <dra-news@m...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Road to native windows OCaml... |
Adrien wrote: > 2008/10/14, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>: > > > > Le 14 oct. 08 à 09:59, David Allsopp a écrit : > > > >> Can I ask what the motivation is for this (out of interest, not > >> criticism)? > > > > Maybe because if you want to distribute executables using cygwin you > > have to release your code under a GPL compatible license [1]. > > > > Daniel > > > > [1] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/distrib/ocaml-3.10/notes/README.win32 > > I would give another explanation : cygwin is big and slow. > A base cygwin install is at least 1GB (when fully configured, after > carefully reviewing *each* package), a regular one is 2GB. XP itself That's not a base install of Cygwin - at least not "base" in terms of building OCaml. My base install, for compiling OCaml MinGW only, is 123MB. Once OCaml is built, I use the Win32 ports of the Unix utilities (at some point I'll switch to GnuWin32 as it's a bit more actively maintained) which adds 18MB and then there's ActiveTCL at about 50MB. However, I make no further defence of Cygwin speed or otherwise as I don't know how it compares. David