On Saturday 04 October 2008 01:49:08 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Sorry if I'm being too frank, but I don't see the usefulness of your
> post. I would love to see basic meta-programming feature in vanilla
> Caml, but the way to make it happen is for sure not lobbying / making
> noise.  The way is provide patches which implement the requested
> feature.

If try..finally will not be accepted what makes you think that a MetaOCaml 
patch would be accepted?

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e