Sorry, I just noticed Richard already answered my question in previous 
email. So Please ignore my previous email. Thanks.

bill yan 已写入:

> Thanks for the help. Another question, It seems *.cma *.cmxa *.a are 
> all native code libraries, why are there so many suffix? Is there any 
> difference between cma, cmxa and a?
>
> Alain Frisch 已写入:
>
>> bill yan wrote:
>>
>>> By my understanding, unlike dlllibrary.so and liblibrary.a give user 
>>> an option to choose compile dynamically or staticly, it seems for 
>>> library.a, user can only choose static method. Does that mean 
>>> "compiled native code" can only be staticly linked to user's 
>>> application?
>>
>>
>>
>> In OCaml 3.11, it will be possible to link native code (found in 
>> library.a or module.o files) into .cmxs files that can be explicitly 
>> loaded at runtime (with the same API as for bytecode Dynlink).
>>
>>
>> Alain
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
>> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
>> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs