Browse thread
understanding weak
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-10-31 (17:00) |
From: | Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] understanding weak |
Daniel Bünzli wrote: > > Le 31 oct. 08 ŕ 15:57, Martin Jambon a écrit : > >> (fst x) would certainly cause funny effects if x were GC'ed at an >> arbitrary time after it has been added to the weak array. > > You are confusing reclaiming the weak pointer (the Some x) and > reclaiming what the weak pointer refers to (the x). It's the former the > OP was talking about. I don't see what makes you define (Some x) as a weak pointer. Martin -- http://mjambon.com/