On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, Markus, and I will take a closer
> look at bin-prot.  One question, however: is it possible to use
> *both* the sexplib and bin-prot syntax extensions on the same
> structure?  That way convenience for the developer is preserved,
> and users can choose which side of the performance vs readability
> trade-off they prefer.

Absolutely, both converters are supported simultaneously.  That's why
we had to factor out the type-conv package, because some code needs to
be shared.

Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com