Le 24 nov. 08 à 22:49, Christophe Raffalli a écrit :
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Maybe things could be done in a lighter way by using objects ?
> Or a camlp4 extension to build the intended function(s) by induction  
> on
> the type definition.
> you could include that as part of deriving
> (http://code.google.com/p/deriving/)


Good idea.
I would regard a deriving-based "class" for generation
of test cases as a very useful enhancement.

However, I do not know the policy of the "deriving"
developers. Would they accept a "class" relying on
a library besides the standard library ?


Xavier