Browse thread
[ANN] Kaputt 1.0 alpha
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-11-24 (22:52) |
From: | forum@x9c.fr <forum@x...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Kaputt 1.0 alpha |
Le 24 nov. 08 à 22:49, Christophe Raffalli a écrit : >> >> (...) >> >> Maybe things could be done in a lighter way by using objects ? > Or a camlp4 extension to build the intended function(s) by induction > on > the type definition. > you could include that as part of deriving > (http://code.google.com/p/deriving/) Good idea. I would regard a deriving-based "class" for generation of test cases as a very useful enhancement. However, I do not know the policy of the "deriving" developers. Would they accept a "class" relying on a library besides the standard library ? Xavier