Browse thread
RE: understanding weak
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | kirillkh <kirillkh@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] RE: understanding weak |
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:08:17AM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > > > You will be interested in the following important article: > > > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308 > > Is this freely available anywhere? > > <rant> > > Seriously, you SPAM everybody here with periodical announces of > non-free issues of the OCaml journal and don't even have access to a > random lab with an ACM subscription? I think the difference is that ACM is about science and Jon's journal is not (AFAIK). And since I think science should be free, I'm on Jon's side here, though I agree that spamming is not nice. Do as we all do: look on authors' homepage, mail them, try citeseer > cache, ... Would be easier, if everyone just published citeseer or direct links. -Kirill