Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
RE: understanding weak
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: kirillkh <kirillkh@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] RE: understanding weak
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 01:08:17AM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > > You will be interested in the following important article:
> > > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1411308
> > Is this freely available anywhere?
>
> <rant>
>
> Seriously, you SPAM everybody here with periodical announces of
> non-free issues of the OCaml journal and don't even have access to a
> random lab with an ACM subscription?


I think the difference is that ACM is about science and Jon's journal is not
(AFAIK). And since I think science should be free, I'm on Jon's side here,
though I agree that spamming is not nice.

Do as we all do: look on authors' homepage, mail them, try citeseer
> cache, ...


Would be easier, if everyone just published citeseer or direct links.

-Kirill