Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David Teller <David.Teller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
Ok, that's an interesting point. Now, we just need to all agree on one
standard :)

On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 12:28 +0000, Benedikt Grundmann wrote:
> > Do you see any better way of managing the complexity of all this?
> Yes don't introduce it at all, make a decision to use or not use labels
> and stick with it.  Similarly make a decision to use or not use exceptions
> as the "default", suffix / rename alternative functions as appropriate
> (consistently). Consistency is a big win.  Not only as it speeds you up
> when you read/modify other people's code it also reduces the amount
> of decisions you have to do when writing new code.
> 
> http://ocaml.janestreet.com/?q=node/28
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bene
> 
-- 
David Teller-Rajchenbach
 Security of Distributed Systems
  http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.