Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included |
Ok, good to know. Since we're packing anyway, there's nothing we can do yet. However, we've already planned to work on a dynamically linked version of Batteries. Just not for release 1.0 So back to square 1 on this argument. Thanks Alain & Zheng On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:10 +0100, Alain Frisch wrote: > David Teller wrote: > > I thought the linker only linked in symbols which were actually used? > > No, it is not the case. > > The only automatic mechanism for code pruning is at the level of > individual modules embedded in a library. As soon as you pack, you > obtain a monolithic module which can only be linked as a whole. > > -- Alain > > -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.