On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 08:50:51PM +0100, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
> Le 18 nov. 08 à 20:22, Richard Jones a écrit :
> >The proposal is to have a hierarchy of OCaml modules, of this sort:
> >
> > Net
> > Net.Amazon
> > Net.BitTorrent
> > Net.FTPServer
> > (and a million more)
> >
> >which doesn't scale.
> 
> If there is nothing in the Net module (and ignoring the linking issue)  
> you can actually achieve that by using -pack. Just redo the pack on  
> the client whenever it installs a new package in the namespace. No ?

No because Net isn't necessarily an empty module, nor does it
magically pull in all the modules underneath it (which would be
impossible because the Net::* space is constantly changing).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat