Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:32:31PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:15:39PM +0100, David Teller wrote:
> > Do you see any better way of managing the complexity of all this?
> 
> I'm still not getting where the benefit of having this hierarchy is,
> except that it adds a Java-like complexity and will create
> hard-to-manage churn if a module ever moves.

Regarding the advantages see my previous post, where I put some
motivations. Regarding the difficulties of moving modules around, how
harder is than moving a module around when you have no hierarchy?

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime