[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2008-11-10 (17:01) |
| From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Implementation of lazy_t |
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 17:31 +0100, Florian Lorenzen wrote: > Especially, if > lazy_t implements call-by-need in the sense that once evaluated > objects are not evaluated again (by means of sharing) or if it > implements call-by-name like one can do by inserting 0-ary lambda > abstractions in the constructor to suspend evaluation and applying > them to force evaluation? That's call-by-need indeed. Cheers, David -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.