Browse thread
About namespaces
-
David Rajchenbach-Teller
-
Christophe Raffalli
- David Rajchenbach-Teller
- Ashish Agarwal
-
Christophe Raffalli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] About namespaces |
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 22:57 +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > And what about include (it is your import) ? It allows what you want and > is short ? No, [include] is the low-level mechanism which must be used to implement the higher-level [import]. The main difference being that [import] needs to read information from all the (findlib) packages which are being used to compile your project and determine all the modules from each package which are registered as providing [List]. The programmer doesn't need to know the exact name of each module. Does that make things any clearer? Cheers, David -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.