Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote:
> > Regarding the advantages see my previous post, where I put some
> > motivations. Regarding the difficulties of moving modules around, how
> > harder is than moving a module around when you have no hierarchy?
> Well I guess what I _meant_ to say was that if your modules aren't in
> a hierarchy to start with, then you won't be tempted to move them
> around the hierarchy :-)
... which sounds like cheating :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime