Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-11-23 (10:32) |
From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > > Regarding the advantages see my previous post, where I put some > > motivations. Regarding the difficulties of moving modules around, how > > harder is than moving a module around when you have no hierarchy? > Well I guess what I _meant_ to say was that if your modules aren't in > a hierarchy to start with, then you won't be tempted to move them > around the hierarchy :-) ... which sounds like cheating :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime