Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-11-18 (23:13) |
From: | Alain Frisch <alain@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included |
On 11/19/2008 12:49 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: > Perhaps that could be solved with extensive Camlp4 hacking to rename the > previous modules (even coming from an "include") to avoid the clash? I don't think so. It seems you need type information. > That brings its own problems, of course. You no longer have a real hierarchy > so you cannot do anything at a given depth in the hierarchy, e.g. apply > mid-level module to a functor. Jon, come on. Is it a joke or do you seriously think that not being able to apply a functor to a subtree of the hierarchy matters in any way in this context? -- Alain