Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-11-18 (11:22) |
From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included |
I thought the linker only linked in symbols which were actually used? On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 11:21 +0100, Zheng Li wrote: > > Your biggest problem is using dot ('.') instead of underscore ('_'). > > Using a dot means that the System namespace cannot be extended by > > external packages. If you use an underscore then an external package > > can extend the namespace (eg. by providing System_Newpackage) > > And, doesn't that forces all sub modules to be linked into the final > executables even if we only use one of them? -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.