On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Dario Teixeira
<darioteixeira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It compiles fine.  Now uncomment the "(* with sexp *)" parts, such that it
> makes use of the Sexplib syntax extension.  The compilation fails on the
> definition of body_sectional_order_t, with an error "type_is_recursive:
> unknown type construct".  Is this a known limitation in Type-conv/Sexplib?

This should be fixed in newer releases of type-conv.

> One last note to the authors of Sexplib: for each reporting of an issue with
> Sexplib there are tons of unreported happy cases.  It is such a great tool
> that I find myself using it everywhere, hence the inevitability of every
> now and then running into problems...

Thanks for the feedback!

Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com