Browse thread
Using camlp4 in extensions
-
Jacques Carette
-
Richard Jones
- Mauricio Fernandez
- Stefano Zacchiroli
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Using camlp4 in extensions |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:24:47PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0500, Jacques Carette wrote: > > Question: is there a way to use a camlp4 extension *inside* the > > definition of another? > > > > AFAIK, extensions are not ordered, so trying to use camlp4 to deal with > > IFDEF in the source of a syntax extension (like pa_monad) to switch > > between 3.10 and 3.11 [to deal with the new private and lazy features] > > does not seem possible. Or have I missed something? > > camlp4 extensions should be composable (as long as they don't actually > conflict with each other). Just list several *.cmo files on the > camlp4 command line. What happened when you tried it? I believe he's not referring to simultaneous use of pa_monad and another extension in user code, but of Camlp4MacroParser *in* the sources of pa_monad. Since pa_monad is build with ocamlc -I +camlp4 -pp camlp4orf -c pa_monad.ml changing that to ocamlc -I +camlp4 -pp "camlp4orf Camlp4MacroParser.cmo" -c pa_monad.ml might work. -- Mauricio Fernandez - http://eigenclass.org