Browse thread
More cores
-
Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen
-
Dario Teixeira
- Alexy Khrabrov
- Richard Jones
- Jon Harrop
- Oliver Bandel
-
Dario Teixeira
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alexy Khrabrov <deliverable@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] More cores |
Well, it's fun to join the old discussion in the new times. The fact that computers go multicore at a greater scale makes it recurrent. Erlang makes concurrency easy due to purity, and OCaml is famous for being eclectic. Why not embrace Erlang's model by imposing limitations on what can be in threads -- keeping them pure? Erlang model works and attracts people to functional programming in general. Even if some other model of concurrency prevails, it is interesting and useful to interop with Erlang easily. Here's what Erlang folks have started: http://code.google.com/p/erlocaml/ Doing this properly can solve a lot of needs out there, and bring lots of debugged, proven, high-quality concurrent server and communication code within reach. Cheers, Alexy