Zitat von Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>:

> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> > But in the case of camlp4 it looks like the bazaar.
> > The regularity of the cathedral, as harsh as crisp as
> > OCaml's type system I miss in the case of Camlp4. :(
>
> OCaml 3.09        OCaml 3.10        OCaml 3.11 .....
>   +                 +                 +
> camlp4 -----+---> camlp4 was -----> camlp4 development --> "new"
> camlp4
>              \    rewritten         continues
>               \
>                \
>                 \ not everyone agrees with
>                   the rewrite, so old camlp4 -----> camlp5
>                   development continues as
>                   camlp5
[...]


Oh, wonderful!

Thank you!


Ciao,
   Oliver