On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:09:23PM +0000, Dr. Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
>> Is there no maintained upstream source for Pycaml?  I noticed the
>> other day that Coccinelle is also shipping Pycaml, and their version
>> doesn't work with Python 2.6 (potential patch attached).
>
> We repeatedly tried to contact the author (Art), but did not succeed.
> So, in the end, we just adopted and extended it.

Thanks for that!

Still, instead of embedding your extensions within coccinelle, what
about maintaining it (or at least realising it once) as the separate
project it deserves to be?

I've kind of a deja-vu with this, with someone else in the past taking
care for a little while of pycaml, but never reaching the outcome of
making a new release taking over its maintenance.

Would you be so kind of going forward with that?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime