English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-02-09 (13:36)
From: Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...>
Subject: Re: ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3)

Le 9 févr. 09 à 14:22, Romain Bardou a écrit :

> Well I would disagree and say that the bare minimum is here. This is  
> why I stopped contributing to the wiki: I had nothing else  
> interesting to add. So now I ask: what exactly is missing from this  
> bare minimum?

A text with paragraph, words and explanations, not scattered phrases  
and paragraphs without coherence. You know a structured document.

> In my opinion, questions such as "can I use the flag function inside  
> the rule function" are definitely not part of the bare minimum.

Not but maybe _when_ I'm supposed to call Plugin.flag is.

> (btw, the answer is: the use of the flag function inside the rule  
> function is not specified, thus not documented)

What do you mean by "not specified", your beautiful "manual" doesn't  
even tell me where/when I should call Plugin.flag.