Browse thread
[ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: ocamlbuild documentation (was Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3) |
Le 9 févr. 09 à 15:04, Romain Bardou a écrit : > However, there ARE some examples in the part which talks about > "flag", where we clearly see an usage (After_rules). Which doesn't mean it cannot be used differently. Anyway it seems useless arguing further: we just don't have the same standards. The only thing I see is that there are still a lot of mentions to makefiles on this list and a lot of new projects don't use ocamlbuild while ocamlbuild is clearly a superior alternative. The only way I can explain this is by lack of good documentation. If you get the standard distribution you don't get documentation for ocamlbuild (except a brief manpage), there's no chapter on ocambuild in the manual, caml's site documentation page doesn't even have a link to the small manual or the wiki (you'll have to google to find it), the plugin api documentation is not installed etc. etc. It's a pitty, given its caml only implementation, ocamlbuild could become a key part of a solid cross platform infrastructure for ocaml. Alas it doesn't seem to be used much (and the reason is IMHO the sad state of its documentation/advertising). Best, Daniel