Browse thread
Threads performance issue.
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-02-17 (09:09) |
From: | Rémi_Dewitte <remi@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Threads performance issue. |
You need to uncomment the line 107 with Thread calls so that it is effectively linked to threads I think and see the difference ! I will try the profiling ! Rémi On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:59, Mark Shinwell <mshinwell@janestcapital.com>wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:40:11AM +0100, Rémi Dewitte wrote: > > I have made some further experiments. > > I have a functional version of the reading algorithm. I have the original > > imperative version of the algorithm. > > Either it is linked to thread (T) or not (X). Either it uses extlib (E) > or > > not (X). > > Using: > > ocamlopt -o foo transf.ml > ocamlopt -thread -o foothread transf.ml unix.cmxa threads.cmxa > > on local disk with a 24Mb, approx. 500,000-line CSV file, I only see a > minor slowdown with foothread as opposed to foo. (A minor slowdown would > inded be expected.) So I'm confused as to why your results are so > different. > > You could use ocamlopt -p and run gprof on the resulting gmon.out file. > > Mark >