Browse thread
Behavior of camlp4o when used with -pp?
-
David Rajchenbach-Teller
-
Jake Donham
- David Rajchenbach-Teller
-
Jake Donham
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-02-10 (22:05) |
From: | David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Behavior of camlp4o when used with -pp? |
Well, in that case, it's an attempt to work around a camlp4 bug. And I'm not attempting to use -no_comments itself, it's just the shortest example I could find of the behavior. Thanks, David On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:10 -0800, Jake Donham wrote: > Basically there is no reason to use -no_comments with -pp. But if you > really want to you can also give -printer o to camlp4o so you always > get the OCaml printer instead of autoselecting. > > Jake > -- David Teller-Rajchenbach Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller « Ce matin Un crétin A tué un chercheur. » (air connu) Latest News of French Research: System being liquidated. Researchers angry.