Browse thread
[ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-02-10 (13:22) |
From: | Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen <mikkel@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3 |
2009/2/10 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>: > Have you reported all this in the Caml bug tracking system? The only > bug ocamlbuild-related which mentions C compiling [1] is way more > specific than this. Please do the effort, seems you seem to have > incurred in the problem, of filing the problems you find, maybe with > workarounds :-) I don't think this is a bug reporting issue. I was concerned with new functionality not incorrect behaviour. There is, for example, no C dependency scanner in ocamlbuild (last I looked). I could of course request features in a bug report, but I thought I'd rather write the code. There has been a few workarounds because ocamlbuild does not have all the hooks (such as supporting exclusive tags (like don't add optimization to debug builds)), but ocamlbuild is surprisingly extensible via the plugin interface. I have been in contact with one of the ocamlbuild developers and got a lot of great help and suggestions, otherwise I could not have written the plugin. Mikkel