Browse thread
[ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-02-09 (22:55) |
From: | Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen <mikkel@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [ANN] OCaml Batteries Included, alpha 3 |
2009/2/9 Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkel@dvide.com>: > Regarding what is missing in ocaml build environment ... I should add that one reason I chose to work with ocaml is also because of its build environment. I links very efficiently with C code and do link with object files. So it is not a self-contained environment that would be difficult to use for systems programming. This is very powerful. But it does have implications as I mentioned before. I'd also like to mention that I find ocamlbuild a very good tool - not only for ocaml, but for building anything. That fact that you can dynamically include dependency generators in the build based on generated build products is outstanding. I hope it will get to used more because many of the platform dependent unix tools used in makefiles could be done in ocaml code instead in a portable way. So I am just mentioning where I see areas for improvement, it is not like I think everything is just bad. Mikkel