Jon,

On Mar 7, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Jon Harrop wrote:

> The [< .. >] denote a stream when matching over one using the  
> "parser" keyword
> and the tick ' denotes a kind of literal to identify a single token  
> in the
> stream. So:
>
>    | [< 'Kwd "if"; p=parse_expr; 'Kwd "then"; t=parse_expr;
>         'Kwd "else"; f=parse_expr >] ->

Should I be using camlp4 grammars as Matthieu suggested?

It seems there are are far more and better resources on doing this  
than the stream parsing approach. This includes your OCaml Journal.

Do I loose anything when going with camlp4 grammars and NOT parsing  
into an OCaml AST? Do I gain a lot with grammars over stream parsing?

	Thanks, Joel

---
http://tinyco.de
Mac, C++, OCaml