Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-03-04 (01:10)
From: Raoul Duke <raould@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] stl?
> modules. That's really really really intrusive. It's exactly why
> monads in haskell are mostly a bad idea. They are too intrusive. If in

what are the current best language/research/advanced/alternative
solutions for this issue?