Browse thread
stl?
-
Raoul Duke
-
Yoann Padioleau
- Till Varoquaux
-
Jon Harrop
- Peng Zang
-
Yoann Padioleau
-
Raoul Duke
- Pal-Kristian Engstad
- Yoann Padioleau
- Jon Harrop
-
Raoul Duke
- Kuba Ober
- Kuba Ober
- Jon Harrop
- Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen
-
Yoann Padioleau
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pal-Kristian Engstad <pal_engstad@n...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] stl? |
Raoul Duke wrote: >> modules. That's really really really intrusive. It's exactly why >> monads in haskell are mostly a bad idea. They are too intrusive. If in >> > > what are the current best language/research/advanced/alternative > solutions for this issue? > > DDC: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/DDC PKE -- Pål-Kristian Engstad (engstad@naughtydog.com), Lead Graphics & Engine Programmer, Naughty Dog, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd, 6000 North, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Ph.: (310) 633-9112. "Emacs would be a far better OS if it was shipped with a halfway-decent text editor." -- Slashdot, Dec 13. 2005.