Browse thread
stl?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erick Tryzelaar <idadesub@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] stl? |
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Raoul Duke <raould@gmail.com> wrote: >> So what you propose to his company is to switch from C++ to HLVM ? :) >> Be serious. > > there are some things out there that interface with c/++ but which > themselves aren't. e.g. http://felix.sourceforge.net/ (although the > last release date was 2006, it apparently still is under active > development.) as a random not entirely serious factoid. Yep, felix is still under active development, we've just been busy/lazy and haven't cut a release yet. Our mailing lists are still active. We actually compile to c++, and then let the c++ compiler assemble the code for us. The development has a ton of new features, like garbage collection using judy arrays, and user extendable grammar. We're exploring compiling straight to llvm, but that's a ways off. If we do go that route, we'd try to preserve the ease of hooking into c and c++ libraries, but use llvm hooks to make the c/c++ call for us.