Browse thread
Parsing 64-bit ints in 32-bit OCaml
-
Jon Harrop
- Jérémie Dimino
- Jean-Christophe_Filliâtre
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jean-Christophe_Filliâtre <Jean-Christophe.Filliatre@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Parsing 64-bit ints in 32-bit OCaml |
Jon Harrop a écrit : > I'm just trying to write efficient functions for div and mod by three. I'd > like to handle 32- and 64-bit machines with the same code so I tried: > > let gcd3 = match Sys.word_size with > | 32 -> 715827883 > | 64 -> 3074457345618258603 > | _ -> failwith "Unknown word size" > > That works perfectly in 64-bit but breaks OCaml's parser in 32-bit, which dies > with: > > Integer literal exceeds the range of representable integers of type int > > As a workaround, I replaced it with: > > | 64 -> Int64.to_int 3074457345618258603L > > Is there a better workaround? I also bump into the same problem from time to time, and I usually replace the large constant by a (launch time) computation, such as (0xffff lsl 16) lor 0xffff for 0xffffffff for instance. In your case, it could simply be (3074457 * 1000000 + 345618) * 1000000 + 258603 But your solution is equally good (the int64 is boxed but is simpler to read). -- Jean-Christophe